Re: Can this query go faster???

From: Joost Kraaijeveld <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl>
To: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Pgsql-Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can this query go faster???
Date: 2005-12-06 11:21:24
Message-ID: 1133868084.8837.73.camel@Panoramix
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Tino,

On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 11:32 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> You can have a row number in postgres easily too. For example if you
> just include a serial for the row number.
Not if the order of things is determined runtime and not at insert time...

> Cursor would work too but you would need to have a persistent connection.
I just tried it: a cursor is not faster (what does not surprise me at
all, as the amount of work looks the same to me)

I guess there is no solution.

--
Groeten,

Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
e-mail: J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl
web: www.askesis.nl

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-12-06 11:36:50 Re: Can this query go faster???
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2005-12-06 10:59:35 Re: BLCKSZ