| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32 |
| Date: | 2005-11-06 09:00:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1131267605.8300.2055.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:01:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
> > > performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
> > > script would probably crash a Windows machine.
> >
> > Ouch. In light of this, are we *sure* what we've got a is a candidate
> > for release?
>
> Good point. It is something we would fix in a minor release, so it
> doesn't seem worth doing another RC just for that.
Will this be documented in the release notes? If we put unimplemented
features in TODO, where do we list things we regard as bugs?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-06 11:40:02 | pgInstaller 8.1 built |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-06 08:45:58 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PostgreSQL | 2005-11-06 09:55:18 | 8.1 iss |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-11-04 22:17:21 | Re: insert performance for win32 |