From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alon Goldshuv <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WAL bypass for CTAS |
Date: | 2005-06-05 08:06:37 |
Message-ID: | 1117958797.3844.1257.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:20 +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Could we do your NOLOGGING automatically in COPY if we test to see if
> > anyone else is connected to our current database?
Remember that this patch doe NOT yet handle COPY, but that is planned...
> That seems pretty fragile -- what happens if someone connects after the
> COPY has started? Considering that many COPY operations can take many
> minutes or hours, I don't think it is wise to make assumptions based on
> the initial state of the system.
Agreed.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gevik babakhani | 2005-06-05 10:35:32 | Re: Solution proposal for TODO item "Clients: sequences" |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2005-06-05 06:00:04 | Re: lastval() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-05 09:56:08 | Re: Server instrumentation: pg_terminate_backend, pg_reload_conf |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2005-06-05 06:00:04 | Re: lastval() |