Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance
Date: 2005-06-03 05:44:14
Message-ID: 1117777454.5018.4.camel@Andrea.peacock.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am Freitag, den 03.06.2005, 00:36 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> On a particular system, loading 1 million rows (100 bytes, nothing
> fancy) into PostgreSQL one transaction at a time takes about 90
> minutes. Doing the same in MySQL/InnoDB takes about 3 minutes. InnoDB
> is supposed to have a similar level of functionality as far as the
> storage manager is concerned, so I'm puzzled about how this can be.
> Does anyone know whether InnoDB is taking some kind of questionable
> shortcuts it doesn't tell me about? The client interface is DBI. This
> particular test is supposed to simulate a lot of transactions happening
> in a short time, so turning off autocommit is not relevant.

Maybe postgres' actually working ref-integrity checks bite here?
That test is a bit vague - maybe we can see more details? :-)

> As you might imagine, it's hard to argue when the customer sees these
> kinds of numbers. So I'd take any FUD I can send back at them. :)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick.FICHE 2005-06-03 06:50:48 Re: Using pg_dump in a cron
Previous Message David Parker 2005-06-03 01:43:20 Re: SQL call to get pid of current connection