Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date: 2009-01-16 20:16:56
Message-ID: 11119.1232137016@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I can't shake the feeling that this is about a couple
> of PostgreSQL hackers (yourself included) not wanting to type \dfS or
> \dfA or something to get the behavior they currently get with \df. If
> that's the case, come off it, because there's lots of evidence on this
> thread (and in all likelihood elsewhere) that this behavior is not
> what end-users want.

As was made clear at the beginning of the thread, that's what they
*think* they want, without any experience with a system that actually
behaves that way. And yes I do believe I know better, both from knowing
how the system works and from actual experience with the ill-considered
patch that's now in HEAD. I'm willing to provide a "U" modifier but
I think it will be a serious error to make that the default behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-01-16 20:41:03 Re: PL test fails on several animals
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-16 20:10:40 Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch