Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer(at)ieee(dot)org>, "'PgSql General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Date: 2005-03-15 22:13:01
Message-ID: 1110924781.6585.38.camel@jd2.commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> Also, a 32-bit machine can only hold so much RAM. If I'm correct, there
> are ways to address more memory than that on a 32 bit machine, but I
> wonder at what cost? In other words, is it a good idea to address more
> than 4GB on a 32 bit machine? If not, is it a reasonable choice to
> invest in 64 bit if you want >4GB of RAM? Or are you better off just
> spending the money on RAID and staying at 4GB?

It entirely depends on the database but not that the 32bit limit of 4GB
is per CPU. So if you have 4 CPUs you can have 16GB of ram.

However, you should be running Opterons anyway.

J

>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
> PS: A minor typo in "Disk and WAL" -> "checkpoint_segments":
> s/Depening/Depending/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Command Prompt, Inc., Your PostgreSQL solutions company. 503-667-4564
Custom programming, 24x7 support, managed services, and hosting
Open Source Authors: plPHP, pgManage, Co-Authors: plPerlNG
Reliable replication, Mammoth Replicator - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Moore 2005-03-15 22:46:09 Re: New user: Windows, Postgresql, Python
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-03-15 21:50:06 Re: plpython function problem workaround