Re: sepgsql contrib module

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)eu(dot)nec(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sepgsql contrib module
Date: 2011-02-15 16:41:47
Message-ID: 11087.1297788107@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Those are good points. My point was just that you can't actually
>>> build that file at the time you RUN the regression tests, because you
>>> have to build it first, then install it, then run the regression
>>> tests. It could be a separate target, like 'make policy', but I don't
>>> think it works to make it part of 'make installcheck'.

>> So? Once you admit that you can do that, it's a matter of a couple more
>> lines to make the installcheck target depend on the policy target iff
>> selinux was enabled.

> Sure, you could do that, but I don't see what problem it would fix.
> You'd still have to build and manually install the policy before you
> could run make installcheck. And once you've done that, you don't
> need to rebuild it every future time you run make installcheck.

Oh, I see: you're pointing out the root-only "semodule" step that has to
be done in between there. Good point. But the current arrangement is
still a mistake: the required contents of sepgsql-regtest.pp depend on
the configuration of the test system, which can't be known at build
time.

So what we should do is offer a "make policy" target and alter the test
instructions to say you should do that and then run semodule. Or maybe
just put the whole "make -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile" dance
into the instructions --- it doesn't look to me like our makefile
infrastructure really has anything useful to add to that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-02-15 16:42:42 Re: XMin Hot Standby Feedback patch
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-02-15 16:37:04 extensions and psql