| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: git: uh-oh |
| Date: | 2010-09-07 15:47:20 |
| Message-ID: | 11003.1283874440@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> writes:
> Personally, the idea of trying to use git-filter-branch to make what
> cvs2git currently gives you more sensible scares me silly.
I'm not excited about it either --- but if Magnus wants to experiment,
no harm trying.
> Another glitch that might be worth fixing before you convert is the way
> that cvs2git says "This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create
> branch", when it actually means "manufactured to incrementally create
> the branch state as it appears in CVS" - i.e. many of these commits
> actually update an existing branch. Just as soon as I can figure out how
> to cleanly fit that into cvs2git's structure, I want it to change the
> word "create" to "update" in most of those commits.
I thought all of those message texts were taken from the configuration
file.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-07 15:50:24 | Re: can we publish a aset interface? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-07 15:43:47 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |