Re: further testing on IDE drives

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: further testing on IDE drives
Date: 2003-10-14 17:25:29
Message-ID: 10952.1066152329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> open_sync was WAY faster at this than the other two methods.

Do you not have open_datasync? That's the preferred method if
available.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-14 17:26:45 Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-14 17:12:50 Re: Large Text Search Help