Re: trash talk

From: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>
To: "David Parker" <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: trash talk
Date: 2004-08-04 00:25:57
Message-ID: 1091579156.27166.115.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:30, David Parker wrote:
> In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1630856,00.asp
>
> eWeek says:
>
> "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
> developers, Rivot said. IBM of course anticipates that population will
> explode when the open-source community gets its hand on the code, but
> just because a product goes open source doesn't mean it will succeed, as
> can be witnessed by the failure of the PostgreSQL database to thrive
> under this model."
>
> It's amazing how much list activity there is for this "dead" database!
> ;-)

That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
understands market-speak.

For him, thrive == grow visible market share, make me some money, let me
buy myself an expensive bottle of wine.
For us, thrive == grow user base, developer base, code base, knowledge
base, let me buy a you a pizza.

I.e. the people who use postgresql mostly love, the people who don't
mostly haven't heard of it. No buzz, no hype. For people who rely on
PostgreSQL to get the job done, this is not a disadvantage.

In response to

  • trash talk at 2004-08-03 19:30:26 from David Parker

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-04 02:41:32 Re: trash talk
Previous Message David Parker 2004-08-03 19:30:26 trash talk

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-04 01:32:53 Re: NOT IN query takes forever
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2004-08-04 00:20:21 Re: root page error