From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | HISADAMasaki <hisada(dot)masaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-15 23:51:53 |
Message-ID: | 1089935513.17493.6923.camel@stromboli |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 00:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 11:44:02PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:16, HISADAMasaki wrote:
>
> > > -- line 236 ---
> > > - pgsignal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
> > >
> > > -- line 236 ---
> > > + pgsignal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand why its returned -1, though I'll take you
> > recommendation. I've not witnessed such an issue. What system are you
> > running, or is it a default shell issue?
> >
> > Do people think that the change is appropriate for all systems, or just
> > the one you're using?
>
> My manpage for signal(2) says that you shouldn't assign SIG_IGN to
> SIGCHLD, according to POSIX. It goes on to say that BSD and SysV
> behaviors differ on this aspect.
>
POSIX rules OK!
So - I should be setting this to SIG_DFL and thats good for everyone?
OK. Will do.
Best regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-16 00:02:38 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-15 23:46:54 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-15 23:59:20 | Re: Very strange Error in Updates |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-15 23:46:54 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-16 00:02:38 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-15 23:46:54 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |