| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch for getXXX methods |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 15:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1089645262.3645.339.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Ok, I'll buy that argument.
--dc--
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 11:06, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> > The reason I use the Double.... is because I am assuming it is faster,
> > if this is not true, then there is no reason to use your suggestion.
>
> I'd take code clarity over performance benefit -- it's an uncommon case
> and the cost of parsing a BigDecimal is likely to be trivial compared to
> the other work the driver does.
>
> -O
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:40f2a91b11386775011984!
>
>
--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Chandler | 2004-07-12 18:07:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Cursors performance |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-12 15:06:30 | Re: patch for getXXX methods |