Re: [subxacts] Aborting a function

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [subxacts] Aborting a function
Date: 2004-07-08 21:41:22
Message-ID: 1089322881.5999.258.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Some sort of modification will be needed to the error processing
> mechanism, but this is beyond me at this point ... I don't have any
> idea how could this be.

So.. If you cannot rollback a subtransaction within a plpgsql function
(all function types or just that one?) then there is no point is
allowing them to be created either.

I say disallow sub-transactions within plpgsql functions until it works
as expected.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-08 21:56:55 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2004-07-08 21:27:34 User Quota Implementation