Re: Resolving 8.4 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolving 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-06-10 18:32:58
Message-ID: 10661.1244658778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> If this issue has existed for several versions, and we're not getting a
> lot of complaints, it says that either not many people are using cube
> and seg or they don't notice performance issues.

> Mind you, if performance is terrible, then not many people *would* use
> cube or seg ...

I suspect there aren't many. What I'm more concerned about is that
people may have copied the bogus logic for use in their own datatypes.
(Which is exactly how Matthew Wakeling came to find out the problem.)
But in any case, this train is leaving the station.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-10 18:37:19 Re: Resolving 8.4 open items
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-06-10 18:32:25 Re: Getting error while trying to insert date with the format 'dd-month-yyyy' , 'day-mm-yyyy' etc..