Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
Date: 2009-12-14 03:15:15
Message-ID: 10660.1260760515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Should I add countBufferUsage boolean arguments to all places
> doInstrument booleans are currently used? This requires several
> minor modifications of codes in many places.

Pushing extra arguments around would create overhead of its own ...
overhead that would be paid even when not using EXPLAIN at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daveg 2009-12-14 03:29:51 Re: pg_dump enhancement proposal
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2009-12-14 03:00:06 Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS