Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)
Date: 2008-09-24 20:08:25
Message-ID: 10637.1222286905@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:05:18AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>> C is not magic obfuscation gear. ...

> To be fair, one of the points that others are trying to make is not
> "secure this function for real" but "secure this function enough to
> make it a little costly."

Agreed, but there seems no particular need to have such a feature in
core Postgres. An add-on PL could accomplish that task just as well;
perhaps more so, if you don't make the add-on available to all and
sundry.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Long 2008-09-24 20:10:10 Re: Slony vs Longiste
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-24 20:03:02 Re: case expression

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Casey Allen Shobe 2008-09-24 20:13:01 Re: Oracle and Postgresql
Previous Message Casey Allen Shobe 2008-09-24 19:44:33 Re: Oracle and Postgresql