Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date: 2013-08-27 13:44:18
Message-ID: 10629.1377611058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> When adding regression tests, can you please add intentional
> syntax error cases to exercise all the new ereport()s?

Please do not add test cases merely to prove that. Yeah, you should
probably have exercised each error case in devel testing, but that does
not mean that every future run of the regression tests needs to do it too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-08-27 13:50:25 Re: dynamic background workers, round two
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2013-08-27 12:56:34 Re: Backup throttling