Re: Powergres (was Re: Errors on restoring a 7.1.2 dump

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Novice ML <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Powergres (was Re: Errors on restoring a 7.1.2 dump
Date: 2003-09-04 09:12:56
Message-ID: 1062666776.17023.2.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 01:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> > What makes Powergres special? From looking at the pretty pictures
> > (and ignoring the squiggly lines), it looks like replication.
>
> Not sure if there's any replication in it. My understanding is that
> it amounts to ripping out the lowest layers of the Postgres code and
> bolting in Fujitsu's proprietary storage engine (originally developed
> for some other DBMS) instead. The Fujitsu people say that this gives
> some significant performance improvements, and for all I know it might
> do replication too. But I've not yet seen a straight answer about
> whether their code preserves MVCC semantics, rollback-able DDL changes,
> and other nice stuff that the regular PG code provides. This report
> from Stuart isn't exactly giving me warm fuzzies about the robustness
> of Fujitsu's code, either.

Here's what someone sent me off-list:
http://osb.sra.co.jp/PowerGres/function-en.php

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!"
Johnny Bravo

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcus Andree S. Magalhaes 2003-09-04 16:12:57 Postgres dump & restore madness
Previous Message Marcin Gil 2003-09-04 08:53:38 postfix+pgsql = unexpected EOF