Re: v7.4 on Windows ... (Was: Re: v7.4 Beta 1 Bundle ...)

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v7.4 on Windows ... (Was: Re: v7.4 Beta 1 Bundle ...)
Date: 2003-08-06 14:08:59
Message-ID: 1060178939.22260.1967.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 09:22, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > depends on what you mean by any. I believe that the standard tarball
> > will compile under windows, but to what extent it will actually run I
> > couldn't say. This release is not intended for native use on windows
> > (that had to be pushed back to 7.5), though it will certainly run via
> > cygwin.
>
> Ummm ... will it compile? I thought that the issue with the Windows
> native port was that it wouldn't yet ... something about fork() vs exec()
> that Bruce was working on?
>

Since it's always more fun to speculate than to wait for the proper
answer... I thought it would compile, but wouldn't actually run due to
exec/fork issues? Course that may have been someones development code
and not what got checked in I suppose...

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Garriss 2003-08-06 14:16:47 Re: ANN: PostgreSQL syntax mode for Vim
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-06 14:07:53 Re: v7.4 on Windows ... (Was: Re: v7.4 Beta 1 Bundle ...)