Re: "truncate all"?

On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 12:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > This this a TODO? Keep in mind if we follow the syntax of VACUUM and
> > (7.4) CLUSTER, that the all-database truncate would just be "TRUNACATE".
> > That seems very risky to me. I wonder if the risk is worth adding this
> > feature.
>
> I wouldn't care for that either. The prior suggestion of "TRUNCATE tab
> CASCADE" (to truncate any tables with FK dependencies on the original
> target, instead of failing) seems more reasonable.
>

Actually there seems to be an ancillary issue here:

21809=# truncate exception;
ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
this one via foreign key constraint $1
21809=# TRUNCATE exception_notice_map ;
TRUNCATE TABLE
21809=# truncate exception;
ERROR: TRUNCATE cannot be used as table exception_notice_map references
this one via foreign key constraint $1
21809=# select count(*) from exception_notice_map;
count
-------
0
(1 row)

21809=#

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL