Re: generic copy options

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-17 14:50:25
Message-ID: 10586.1253199025@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com> writes:
> Does that mean that we can drop the 7.3 syntax or should we just keep it?

I wouldn't object to dropping the 7.3 syntax now, especially if we're
about to introduce a new syntax and deprecate the old one ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emmanuel Cecchet 2009-09-17 15:07:33 Re: generic copy options
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-17 14:45:23 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL