Re: Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.
Date: 2011-02-16 23:10:25
Message-ID: 10499.1297897825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <post(at)gwene(dot)org> writes:
>> Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.

> Do we only want to care about functions here?

Yes. Functions/aggregates are the only object type where pg_dump tries
to suppress fetching any information at all about system-owned objects;
it's the only case where there's so many system objects as to be worth
the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-16 23:11:49 Re: SSI bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-16 23:03:45 Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling