Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: ts(at)moulon(dot)inra(dot)fr, hornyakl(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)
Date: 2003-03-24 22:05:10
Message-ID: 1048543510.13799.417.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Since people didn't like referencing all of these in the postgresql
docs, I used to add a notes at the bottom of the idocs, but I guess it
slipped off my radar. That being the case, I've added a page for this on
the techdocs site, available at
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Pgplmeta

If the language maintainers would be willing to look over the
information and make any corrections that would be great.

Robert Treat

On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 14:04, Joe Conway wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > http://pljava.sourceforge.net/
>
> Interesting -- I did a quick search on sourceforge, but I guess it was a
> bit too quick.
>
> > BTW, you can also write stored procedures in Ruby, C, and SQL.
>
> I wasn't aware of Ruby, but I don't know how I could possibly have
> forgotten to mention C and SQL!
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't have a spot on techdocs with links to all of
> the Postgres PLs all in one place? It makes for an impressive list; for
> the record:
>
> Available PostgreSQL Procedural Languages
> ==========================================
> C
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/xfunc-c.html
>
> SQL
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/xfunc-sql.html
>
> PL/pgSQL
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/plpgsql.html
>
> PL/Perl
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/plperl.html
>
> PL/Tcl
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/pltcl.html
>
> PL/Python
> http://www.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/plpython.html
>
> PL/sh
> http://webmail.postgresql.org/~petere/plsh.html
>
> PL/R
> http://www.joeconway.com/plr/
>
> PL/Java
> http://pljava.sourceforge.net/
>
> PL/Ruby
> http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=pl-ruby
>
> ==========================================
>
> Joe
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-03-24 22:25:34 Re: [GENERAL] PL/Java (was: stored procedures)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-03-24 18:51:39 Re: Your database comparison article

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Welty 2003-03-24 22:07:00 Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Previous Message Joshua Moore-Oliva 2003-03-24 21:57:45 Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for