Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date: 2005-08-08 23:43:59
Message-ID: 10413.1123544639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> No one is every going to do it, so we might as well make the best guess
> we have. I think any platform where the *data* options are slower than
> the non-*data* options is broken, and if that logic holds, we might as
> well just use *data* by default if we can, which is my proposal.

Adjusting the default settings I don't have a problem with. Removing
options I have a problem with --- and that appeared to be what you
were proposing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-08 23:45:38 Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-08-08 23:11:27 Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method