Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Date: 2009-09-17 14:32:42
Message-ID: 10393.1253197962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> because it will break applications that depend on CTID.

> Do you know of any such applications out in the wild ?

Yes, they're out there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emmanuel Cecchet 2009-09-17 14:44:28 Re: generic copy options
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2009-09-17 14:31:08 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL