Re:

From: Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
To: karlgold(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL JDBC List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-11-05 17:25:36
Message-ID: 1036517136.25524.17.camel@inspiron.cramers
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Unfortunately, until the backend gives us usefull error codes, there's
not much we can do about catching exceptions intelligently.

And yes, the behaviour is intended, once a transaction has failed, you
need to end, or roll it back

Dave
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 12:19, Karl Goldstein wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion either way. For me, the main problem with the current behavior is
> simply that the error message is confusing. If it is indeed the case that any SQLException
> invalidates the current transaction (and my impression is that this is not intended), then the
> driver should report that directly and not even let you try to execute later statements. The "No
> results were returned by the query" error just left me scratching my head.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karl
>
> --- Daniel Serodio <daniel(at)checkforte(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> > I've never worked with Oracle, just MySQL and PostgreSQL, but isn't this
> > the definition of a transaction?
> >
> > "A transaction is an atomic unit of processing; it is eigher performed
> > in its entirety or not at all"
> >
> > My understanding of this is that if one statement failed, all of the
> > following statements should fail.
> >
> > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 14:31, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there's any chance of this behavior to change in the
> > > future ?
> > > I mean will it be possible to continue a transaction after one of the SQLs
> > > failed, by only rolling back what that query did ?
> > > In many real life applications recovery is very possible after a failed
> > > query, and (the not failed part of) the transaction should be committed.
> > > This is one of the big differences in behavior between Postgres and Oracle,
> > > making life hard for porting...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Csaba.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-11-05 17:19:59 from Karl Goldstein

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-11-05 17:35:06 from Karl Goldstein
  • Re: at 2002-11-05 17:37:38 from Daniel Serodio

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2002-11-05 17:29:23 Re:
Previous Message Karl Goldstein 2002-11-05 17:19:59 Re: