Re: WAL sync behaviour

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL sync behaviour
Date: 2005-11-10 17:44:15
Message-ID: 10320.1131644655@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for the clarification! Nice to know I can setup an ext2
> partition for my WAL files then. Is this in the docs anywhere?

Don't think so ... want to write something up? Hard part is to
figure out where to put it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2005-11-10 17:58:43 Re: WAL sync behaviour
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-10 17:23:20 Re: same plan, add 1 condition, 1900x slower