| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-15 18:10:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1029435025.18448.20.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But how many people would even use it? I can't see adding the bloat
> unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on. Am I wrong
> and really alot of people actually want/need this?
At an absolute minimum there are two. Myself and Marc.
That said, this is a semi-required step to offerring Postgresql as a
service to clients. The refined permissions where a much more important
step.
So, take the number of people actively watching -hackers and use that as
a percentage.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-08-15 18:18:15 | Re: Standard replication interface? |
| Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-08-15 18:03:53 | Re: Standard replication interface? |