Re: oid's and primary keys on insert

From: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob(at)zoism(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: oid's and primary keys on insert
Date: 2002-08-10 03:33:52
Message-ID: 1028950431.3626.6.camel@everglade.zoism.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 15:23, Joe Conway wrote:

> > Thats realy the only reason I didn't do that. Not realy a goot reason
> > at that...
> >
>
> I had the exact same experience. Having a 2 column primary key on every
> table (and hence for every foreign key as well) gets unmanageable pretty
> quickly.

Yep, exactly. I have just been thinking that it was not really a good
reason and I must have had another reason there it is, foreign keys...
Thanks, I almost convinced myself to go back...

--

*
* Rob Brown-Bayliss
*

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-10 05:04:24 Re: [GENERAL] workaround for lack of REPLACE() function
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-10 03:23:54 Re: oid's and primary keys on insert