| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2002-08-02 14:14:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1028297687.23673.2.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> writes:
> > I seem to find this argument a lot on the list here. For some reason,
> > many of the developers are under the impression that even if code is
> > never touched, it has a very high level of effort to keep it in the code
> > base. That is, of course, completely untrue.
>
> FWIW, I did not notice any of the core developers making that case.
>
I've seen it used a lot. In many cases, it's asserted with nothing to
support it other than the fact that they are a core developer, however,
these assertions are often given against unspecified and undeveloped
code, so, it makes such an assertion invalid.
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-08-02 14:18:50 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-02 14:01:36 | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |