Re: RC1?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-12 18:12:48
Message-ID: 10109.1037124768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> abstime, tinterval and horology fail on AIX.=20

I would expect them now (without NO_MKTIME_BEFORE_1970) to match the
solaris-1947 comparison files for these tests. Could you confirm that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-12 16:34:09 from Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-12 18:23:02 Re: Inconsistent or incomplete behavior obverse in where
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2002-11-12 18:11:01 Re: Idea for better handling of cntxDirty