Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ian Barwick" <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Date: 2014-10-09 12:53:44
Message-ID: 0DE448BBC4D24EE0A3711670921C49EF@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> I hope we can get pgAudit in as a module for 9.5. I also hope that it
> will stimulate the requirements/funding of further work in this area,
> rather than squash it. My feeling is we have more examples of feature
> sets that grow over time (replication, view handling, hstore/JSONB
> etc) than we have examples of things languishing in need of attention
> (partitioning).

I'm hoping PostgreSQL will have an audit trail feature. I'd like to support
your work by reviewing and testing, although I'm not sure I can fully
understand the code soon.

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-09 13:23:22 Re: Log notice that checkpoint is to be written on shutdown
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-10-09 12:47:09 Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction