Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date: 2013-11-19 18:27:30
Message-ID: 0916D5F3-71C1-46DE-8F67-255C8C7BF8EA@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not sure how much code it's going to take (I'd hope somewhat less),
> but it certainly will take some time to agree how it should be built and
> then building and integrating it.

Given that the situation we're in right now is that we have an unknown number of silently corrupt secondaries out there which will only be discovered when someone promotes them to being a primary (possibly because the current primary died without a backup), I'd say that this is something pretty urgent.

--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-19 18:29:31 Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-11-19 18:25:39 Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1