From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Naeslund(t)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu, Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Date: | 2004-03-25 20:07:23 |
Message-ID: | 0786736F-7E98-11D8-9C78-000393CFE6B8@spy.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 25, 2004, at 9:22, Magnus Naeslund(t) wrote:
> > You can use distributed revision control systems as centralized
> > systems, but not vice-versa.
> >
>
> Not true, the other way around exists, that is what svk does.
From its description, svk sounds like a completely different system:
``svk is a decentralized version control system written in Perl. It
uses the subversion filesystem but provides some other powerful
features.''
I.e. it seems to have a CVS vs. RCS relationship. It would be unfair
to call CVS RCS.
--
Dustin Sallings
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | günter strubinsky | 2004-03-25 20:07:35 | Re: bug in delete rule ? |
Previous Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 20:05:19 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-03-25 21:01:05 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Previous Message | Dustin Sallings | 2004-03-25 20:05:19 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |