Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option

From: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option
Date: 2010-07-20 22:16:53
Message-ID: 05E4D220-138F-4A5B-80A8-738DC3B92660@endpoint.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> Top posting. On purpose. :p
>
> This patch seems to be foundering in a sea of opinions. It seems
> that everybody wants to do *something* about this, but what?
>
> For one more opinion, my shop has chosen to never touch the default
> postgresql.conf file any more, beyond adding one line to the bottom
> of it which is an include directive, to bring in our overrides.
>
> What will make everyone happy here?

So you'll now issue:

$ initdb ... -C 'include localconfig.conf' ? :-)

Regards,

David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-07-20 22:31:41 Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-07-20 22:00:31 Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option