Re: git: uh-oh

On Aug 17, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:28, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> The tip of every branch, and every single tag, all have the correct
>>> data in them, but some revisions in between seem majorly confused.
>>
>> It seems to me that what we'll need to do here is write a script to
>> look through the CVS history of each file and make sure that the
>> versions of that file which appear on each branch match the revs in
>> CVS in content, order, and the commit message associated with any
>> changes. However, that's not going to do get done today.
>
> Yeah. Unless someone comes up with a good way to fix this, or even
> better an explanation why it's actually ont broken and we're looking
> at things wrong :D, I think we have no choice but aborting the
> conversion for now and come back to it later.

Can you post the cvs2svn command line used for conversion?

Regards,

David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com