| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal) |
| Date: | 2008-02-09 01:21:11 |
| Message-ID: | 058c01c86aba$0e4c4580$0301a8c0@HP22720319231 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrew-san.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>
> How the heck are we going to document this reasonably? It strikes me as
> horribly complicated and puzzling for users. The current rule might be
> an annoyance in porting applications, but it has the advantage of
> simplicity. If we can somehow make AS optional across the board, then
> well and good, otherwise I am very dubious about making any change.
Ah yes, user's confusion wants to consider a good method so that you
may consider, in order to make it avoid. good proposal is desired.
P.S)
I go out and am no answering for a while. sorry..
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-02-09 05:16:56 | Re: Patch review |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-02-09 01:11:04 | Re: "AS" by the syntax of table reference.(8.4 proposal) |