Re: wxWindows Build

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wxWindows Build
Date: 2003-06-27 21:00:15
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B16D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de]
> Sent: 27 June 2003 21:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> > As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5
> > for.
>
> Nope.
>
> The dialog metrics are vastly improved in 2.5, so gtk really
> looks the
> same as win32. Most strings won't fit in gtk if 2.4 if used,
> the fonts
> are really messed up.
>
> Still, I wonder about this version discussion. AFAIR we simply have
> --with-wx, and evaluate the version that's stored there.

Another point of note - from the reply Raphael got from his Debian
packager friend it sounds like the wx CVS is currently being turned
upside-down whilst they reorganise the structure.

Looks like we're stuck with 2003-06-07.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-06-27 22:09:57 Re: wxWindows Build
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-06-27 20:44:58 Re: wxWindows Build