Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-13 19:27:38
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259DA4@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [mailto:ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at]
> Sent: 13 March 2003 17:07
> To: Hiroshi Inoue; Dave Page
> Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us; pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us;
> pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
>
>
> If this where at the protocol level, the client could flag
> what info is wanted, and thus avoid all unwanted overhead.

But the client usually won't know at that point. For example, an ODBC
app executes a query and reads the tuples returned. After that has
occured, the app calls SQLDescribeCol to describe a column in the
resultset...

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-03-13 19:32:28 Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-03-13 19:24:45 Re: Problems with win32 patch/build