Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c

From: "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c
Date: 2003-09-09 14:53:06
Message-ID: 029301c376e2$1b3f3700$4c720b3e@mm.eutelsat.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> The particular assertion that was proposed doesn't strike me as terribly
> useful - It should be checked at the point of call rather than inside
> pstrdup, I should have thought.

Are you going to trust the client of that function ?
Here the question is not if insert a check/assert there but write a general
rule if insert and where check/assert

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-09-09 14:56:20 Re: plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to boolean
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-09 14:44:30 Re: Maximum table size

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera Munoz 2003-09-09 15:14:57 Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-09 13:40:27 Re: [PATCHES] mcxt.c