Re: best place for xstrdup

From: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: best place for xstrdup
Date: 2003-09-16 15:19:30
Message-ID: 028901c37c65$ed346180$152aa8c0@GMENDOLA2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> > if ( !ret_value ) {
> > ereport(FATAL,
> > (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY),
> > errmsg("strdup out of memory")));
> > }
>
> Should be ERROR not FATAL (the places that are insisting on FATAL are
> special cases that won't be able to use this code). Also the text
> should just be "out of memory".

Ok.

> Per previous discussion, I don't believe in the test for null input,
> either ...

Ok ok, I just tried :-)

> It might be worth creating an xmalloc as well, since I think there
> are some unchecked malloc's in some places.

I'll see

> As for where to put it, mcxt.c may be the best place. aset.c does
> not contain any routines that are supposed to be globally known.

Ok

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-16 16:30:37 New thoughts about indexing cross-type comparisons
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-16 15:08:28 Re: best place for xstrdup