From: | "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: best place for xstrdup |
Date: | 2003-09-16 15:19:30 |
Message-ID: | 028901c37c65$ed346180$152aa8c0@GMENDOLA2 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> > if ( !ret_value ) {
> > ereport(FATAL,
> > (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY),
> > errmsg("strdup out of memory")));
> > }
>
> Should be ERROR not FATAL (the places that are insisting on FATAL are
> special cases that won't be able to use this code). Also the text
> should just be "out of memory".
Ok.
> Per previous discussion, I don't believe in the test for null input,
> either ...
Ok ok, I just tried :-)
> It might be worth creating an xmalloc as well, since I think there
> are some unchecked malloc's in some places.
I'll see
> As for where to put it, mcxt.c may be the best place. aset.c does
> not contain any routines that are supposed to be globally known.
Ok
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-16 16:30:37 | New thoughts about indexing cross-type comparisons |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-16 15:08:28 | Re: best place for xstrdup |