Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mike Mascari" <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-23 04:14:07
Message-ID: 021a01c3393d$e44c4da0$2800a8c0@mars
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> No. I want to know what the subordinate does when it's promised to
> commit and the co-ordinator never responds. AFAICS the subordinate
> is screwed --- it can't commit, and it can't abort, and it can't expect
> to make progress indefinitely on other work while it's holding locks
> for the not-quite-committed transaction.

It takes itself offline and you need to resync it later??

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-23 04:18:56 Re: O_DIRECT in freebsd
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-06-23 04:13:37 Re: O_DIRECT in freebsd