Re: On partitioning

From: "Amit Langote" <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "'Stephen Frost'" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Andres Freund'" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "'Pg Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: 2014-11-13 07:25:22
Message-ID: 00d901cfff12$fc820f70$f5862e50$@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Amit Langote
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:50 PM
>
> Greenplum uses a single table for this purpose with separate columns for
range
> and list cases, for example. They store allowed values per partition though.
> They have 6 partitioning related catalog/system views., by the way. Perhaps,
> interesting as a reference.
>
> http://gpdb.docs.pivotal.io/4330/index.html#ref_guide/system_catalogs/pg_p
> arti
> tions.html
>

Oops, wrong link. Use this one instead.
http://gpdb.docs.pivotal.io/4330/index.html#ref_guide/system_catalogs/pg_parti
tion_rule.html

> Thanks,
> Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2014-11-13 07:26:01 Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-11-13 07:19:44 Re: On the warpath again about ill-considered inclusion nests