From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "'Pg Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposed community service: make coverage |
Date: | 2012-10-25 06:07:21 |
Message-ID: | 009701cdb276$ff6226c0$fe267440$@kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 6:37 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the course of some discussion, I proposed the possibility of us
> exposing a continuously updated copy of the "make coverage" target,
> after running some standard test suite (possibly some of the
> "check-world" targets). This would give everyone some visibility into
> the code that's being regularly exercised by our test suite.
I think apart from above, it can also provide information about coverage
of new code getting added w.r.t testcases(existing/new).
> Right now we have the support, but I haven't heard of anyone actually
> looking at the results, much less doing anything about them.
>
> Does this sound interesting/useful to hackers?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-10-25 08:25:34 | Re: splitting *_desc routines |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-25 03:17:53 | Re: enhanced error fields |