| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Yaroslav Dmitriev" <yar(at)warlock(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: []performance issues |
| Date: | 2002-08-03 10:07:50 |
| Message-ID: | 008401c23ad5$a0e39670$0200a8c0@SOL |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> So I am still interested in PostgreSQL's ability to deal with
> multimillon records tables.
Postgres has no problem with multimillion row tables - many people on this
list run them - just don't do sequential scans on them if you can't afford
the time it takes.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Dobbin | 2002-08-03 10:15:17 | Re: Postgres and Perl: Which DBI module? |
| Previous Message | Cédric Dufour | 2002-08-03 09:50:50 | Re: b1 OR b2 <-> ( CASE WHEN b1 THE true ELSE b2 END ): performance bottleneck on logical OR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-03 10:13:38 | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-03 06:00:47 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |