From: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "'Magnus Hagander'" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG |
Date: | 2007-11-30 15:43:03 |
Message-ID: | 002b01c83367$b1b8b760$0a01a8c0@gevmus |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I did look at this at some earlier point as well. One big
> problem at that time was that once you embedded mono, you had
> all sorts of threads running in your backend ;-)
yes, threads running around could become a show stopper for both Mono and
MS.NET
This is something I want to be sure of before I begin.
> Another way to do it is "the PL/J" way (I think). Which is
> starting up a separate process with the VM in it and then do
> RPC of some kind to it.
> Which has more overhead per call, but lower per backend etc.
> And a lot less "dangerous".
This is actually my plan B, hence it is less dangerous.
I am thinking the "started process" can stay alive and act
as a service of some kind to handle/answer calls form multiple
backends and shutdown itself after a period of time being
idle.
Regards,
Gevik Babakhani
------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL NL http://www.postgresql.nl
TrueSoftware BV http://www.truesoftware.nl
------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-11-30 15:48:11 | Re: .NET or Mono functions in PG |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-30 15:40:58 | Re: PostGreSQL and recursive queries... |