| From: | "Akshay Mathur" <akshay(dot)mathur(at)airtightnetworks(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Ron'" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Massive performance issues |
| Date: | 2005-09-02 09:23:58 |
| Message-ID: | 002901c5afa0$0dcddab0$8301a8c0@pune.wibhu.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ron,
Can you give me some pointers to make the tables RAM resident. If one
does so, is the program accessing the data need to change. Does pgsql
take care to write the data to disk?
Regards,
akshay
---------------------------------------
Akshay Mathur
SMTS, Product Verification
AirTight Networks, Inc. (www.airtightnetworks.net)
O: +91 20 2588 1555 ext 205
F: +91 20 2588 1445
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 2:36 AM
To: Tom Lane; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Massive performance issues
Even better, if the table(s) can be made RAM resident, then searches,
even random ones, can be very fast. He wants a 1000x performance
improvement. Going from disk resident to RAM resident should help
greatly in attaining that goal.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-09-02 09:42:59 | Re: Avoid using swap in a cluster |
| Previous Message | apoc9009@yahoo.de | 2005-09-02 05:12:34 |