Re: ORDER BY question

From: "Luis H(dot)" <pgsql-novice(at)geekhouse(dot)no-ip(dot)com>
To: "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ORDER BY question
Date: 2003-09-01 19:34:40
Message-ID: 001701c370c0$165bc2d0$0301a8c0@bigbertha
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

I looked into the headers, and saw all the thread tracking info. I had no
idea this was going on in the background. Sorry for any confusion this might
have caused in your mail clients!

- Luis

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: "Luis H." <pgsql-novice(at)geekhouse(dot)no-ip(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] ORDER BY question

> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:57:04 -0400,
> "Luis H." <pgsql-novice(at)geekhouse(dot)no-ip(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the info! Group by should do the trick.
> >
> > Why does replying to an unrelated message create an issue, btw? I
changed
> > the subject, headers and contents of the e-mail. Or at least I thought I
> > did!
>
> Because message threading isn't tracked by subject. There are other
> headers that indicate a message is a reply and you didn't change the one
> your mail client uses. Doing this hides your message in a thread with
> a different topic.
>
> > Also, why do people reply to both the message sender and the mailing
list?
> > Doesn't it just arrive duplicated in the sender's mailbox.
>
> How do we know you are subscribed to the list?
>
> If you don't want to be copied personally, setting the mail-followup-to
> header will do this for many clients.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-01 21:07:37 Re: starting up database server + user postgres
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-09-01 19:15:44 Re: starting up database server + user postgres