Partial Indexes condtions

From: "Donald Fraser" <demolish(at)cwgsy(dot)net>
To: "[BUGS]" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Partial Indexes condtions
Date: 2003-08-13 10:40:08
Message-ID: 001401c36187$47380a00$1664a8c0@DEMOLITION
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PostgreSQL 7.3.3, GCC 2.96 on Redhat 7.2

Not sure whether you classify this as a bug or not?
Anyway here goes:

I have a partial index such as:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX tbl_test_key
ON tbl_test
USING btree
(s_mnem)
WHERE ((n_status & (~9)) <> 0);

I have a select statement such as:
SELECT s_mnem FROM tbl_test WHERE (n_status & (~9) <> 0);

It doesn't matter what I do (including SET enable_seqscan TO OFF)
Explain shows that the planner always chooses a sequential scan.

Now if I change the partial index to the following:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX tbl_test_key
ON tbl_test
USING btree
(s_mnem)
WHERE ((n_status & -10) <> 0);

Note: the binary inverse of 9 is -10.

Explain shows that the planner now chooses to use the partial index?

Regards
Donald Fraser.

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Marshall 2003-08-13 12:02:53 JDBC Metadata bug
Previous Message systems 2003-08-13 01:47:03 Slow Query