Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
- From: Dan Bikle <dan(dot)bikle(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:53 -0700
- Message-id: <74252ed10907211608l73394428nc5b802b96a0ace29@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
My opinion is that sfpug is good enough for the entire bay area. We
dont need sjcpug or svpug.
On 7/21/09, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Sorry to write twice, but i'm actually kind of curious about this.
> Don't we already have an sfpug? Is San Jose and the rest of silicon
> valley not the same group of people as San Francisco?
>
> If it is it seems pretty clear "sv" isn't instantly recognizable. I
> would suggest valleypug :) But really I think I would suggest you
> speak to the sfpug people about having extra locations for sfpug
> events.
>
> --
> greg
> http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index